Decisions
The Investment Committee has decided to make a small change to all investment solutions.
Going forward, the liquidity ratio in all findependent investment solutions will be set at 1%. The halving of the previous ratio was made possible through technical optimizations. The “freed-up” funds will be invested in bonds for the Cautious, Considered, Balanced, and Adventurous solutions, and in equities for the Risk-Taking solution. Implementation will take place during Q1 2026.
No other changes have been made. In particular, the Committee acknowledges the substantial returns from Swiss equities in the 2025 investment year, but continues to see attractive returns for investors with a long-term horizon. Swiss equities are fairly valued and, overall, offer a diversified opportunity to participate in the success of well-managed companies.
Additionally, the Committee sees no reason to believe that the long-term return potential of a diversified portfolio, focused on global equities, CHF bonds, and Swiss real estate funds, will be significantly reduced.
Additional ETF for Personal Investment Solutions
From now on, customers who wish to create their own ETF-based investment solution can choose from the following two additional ETFs:
- Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield
- Xtrackers NASDAQ 100
Both ETFs meet the strict selection criteria and complement the existing offering.
The Vanguard ETF has been added in response to multiple customer requests and is suitable for investors who want to invest globally in high-dividend-yield equities.
The Xtrackers ETF replaces the previous iShares ETF on the NASDAQ 100 Index. All existing customer holdings will be exchanged cost-efficiently. The new ETF offers lower annual product costs for existing investments (0.20% vs. 0.30%) and a significantly lower per-unit price for future investments, allowing for more individualized portfolio allocation.
Other Matters
The Committee also discussed the role of Swiss government bonds in the current zero-interest-rate environment and decided not to change their weighting. On the one hand, they serve as a stability anchor in times of crisis. On the other hand, the list of viable alternatives is very short, offering little additional expected return while sometimes carrying significantly higher risks.